Mods! Rachel may mean "one of purity" but not in this case!

Post Reply
JewelryQueen
Posts: 2200
Joined: 4 years ago

Mods! Rachel may mean "one of purity" but not in this case!

Post by JewelryQueen » 3 years ago

@Moderator_Rashad
@shopLC_alex

Rachel has been naughty in the RA with Swarovski. The following is but a sampling of her bids:

Bid...Item #
$49 3694546
$49 3554326
$44 3574282
$49 3508718
$49 3556812
$49 6012564
$49 3660999
$34 3557997
$49 3340431
$49 3542342

Well over $500 bid for $120 worth. This started out with me trying to get a little ring for a neighbor girl. It is now a quest to stop this nonsense!
2 x

JewelryQueen
Posts: 2200
Joined: 4 years ago

Re: Mods! Rachel may mean "one of purity" but not in this case!

Post by JewelryQueen » 3 years ago

...
Did you moderators miss this one?
1 x

Moderator_Rashad
Posts: 85
Joined: 3 years ago

Re: Mods! Rachel may mean "one of purity" but not in this case!

Post by Moderator_Rashad » 3 years ago

JewelryQueen wrote:
3 years ago
...
Did you moderators miss this one?
Good morning,

Thank you so much for your message. I apologize for any concern with overbidding. I've actioned the account in question and taken appropriate steps to ensure proper bidding practices.
1 x

Harlequin
Posts: 1976
Joined: 4 years ago

Re: Mods! Rachel may mean "one of purity" but not in this case!

Post by Harlequin » 3 years ago

You’re doing a GREAT JOB JQ..... but it will NEVER CHANGE..... ALWAYS FALLING ON DEAF EARS!!!!!!! Never will be heard, when people don’t CARE😫
1 x

Kb
Posts: 85
Joined: 4 years ago

Re: Mods! Rachel may mean "one of purity" but not in this case!

Post by Kb » 3 years ago

I'd stop bidding. Couldn't be bothered watching what everyone else bids.
0 x

Post Reply